Indian glaciers: saving accounts
Alarm over Indian glacier's hasty retreat
By Somini Sengupta
International Herald Tribune July 17, 2007
CHORABARI GLACIER, India: This is how a glacier retreats. At nearly 4,000 meters above sea level, in the shadow of a sharp Himalayan peak, a wall of black ice oozes in the sunshine. A tumbling stone breaks the silence of the mountains, or water gurgles under the ground, a sign that the glacier is melting from inside. Where it empties out - scientists call it the snout - a noisy, frothy stream rushes down to meet the River Ganges.
D.P. Dobhal, a glaciologist who has spent three years climbing and poking the Chorabari glacier, stands at the edge of the snout and points ahead. Three years ago, the snout was roughly 27 meters, or 90 feet, farther away. On a map drawn in 1962, it was plotted 262 meters from here. Dobhal marked the spot with a Stonehenge-like pile of rocks.
Dobhal's steep and solitary quest - to measure the changes in the glacier's size and volume - points to a looming worldwide concern with particularly serious repercussions for India and its neighbors. The thousands of glaciers studded across 2,400 kilometers, or 1,500 miles, of the Himalayas make up the savings account of South Asia's water supply, feeding more than a dozen major rivers and sustaining a billion people downstream. Their apparent retreat threatens to bear heavily on everything from the region's drinking water supply to agricultural production to disease and floods.
Indian glaciers are among the least studied in the world, lacking the decades of data that scientists need to deduce trends. Nevertheless, the nascent research offers a snapshot of the consequences of global warming for this country and raises vital questions about how it will respond to them.
According to Dobhal's measurements, the Chorabari's snout has retreated nine meters every year for the last three years, and while that is too short a time to draw any scientific conclusions about the glacier's health, it conforms to a disquieting pattern of glacial retreat across the Himalayas.
A recent study by the Indian Space Research Organization, using satellite imaging to gauge the changes to 466 glaciers, has found more than a 20 percent reduction in size between 1962 and 2001, with bigger glaciers breaking into smaller pieces, each one retreating faster than its parent. A separate study found the Parbati glacier, one of the largest in the area, to be retreating by 52 meters a year during the 1990s. Another glacier that Dobhal has tracked, known as Dokriani, lost 20 percent of its size in three decades. Between 1991 and 1995, its snout withdrew almost 17 meters each year.
Similar losses are being seen around the world. Lonnie Thompson, a glaciologist at Ohio State University, found a 22 percent loss of ice on the Qori Kalis glacier in Peru between 1963 and 2002. He called it "a repeating theme whether you are in the tropical Andes, the Himalayas or Kilimanjaro in Africa."
The Chorabari, sweeping down from Kedarnath across nearly six square kilometers, is relatively lucky. It has a thick cover of rocks and boulders, which acts as a sort of insulation and slows down the melting.
Since Dobhal began collecting data here in 2003, the Chorabari has been shedding its weight - that is to say, melting faster than the rate at which snow and ice accumulates, and as a result, thinning out by roughly 1.5 meters each year. The snow line, in addition, is gradually moving higher.
A vast and ancient sheet of ice, a glacier is in effect the planet's most sensitive organ, like an aging knee that feels the onset of winter. Its upper reaches accumulate snow and ice when it is cold; its lower reaches melt when it is warm. Its long-term survival depends on the balance between the buildup and the melting. Glaciers worldwide serve as a barometer for global warming, which has, according to a report this year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, been spurred in recent decades by rising levels of greenhouse gases.
Even the Himalayas have grown measurably warmer. A recent study found that mean air temperature in the northwestern Himalayan range had risen by 2.2 degrees Celsius (4 degrees Fahrenheit) in the past two decades, a rate considerably higher than the rate of increase over the last 100 years.
It its report, the international panel predicted that as these glaciers melt, they would increase the likelihood of flooding over the next three decades and then, as they recede, dry up the rivers that they feed.
"In the course of the century," it said, "water supply stored in glaciers and snow cover are projected to decline, reducing water availability in regions supplied by meltwater from major mountain ranges, where more than one-sixth of the world population currently lives."
India's public response so far has been to blame the industrialized world for rising emissions and resist any mandatory caps of its own. India's per-capita share of emissions is one-twentieth that of industrialized countries, the government points out, going on to argue that any restrictions on emissions would stunt its economic growth.
And yet, as critics say, India's rapid economic advance, combined with a population of more than a billion people, will soon make it a far bigger contributor to greenhouse gases. More to the point, India stands to bear some of the most devastating consequences of human-induced climate change.
The dearth of scientific knowledge adds to the alarm. River flow data are so scant and recent that it is impossible for scientists to predict how current rates of glacial retreat will affect river volume.
To spend a couple of days with Dobhal, 44, a glaciologist with the Wadia Institute for Himalayan Geology, a government-sponsored research institution based in the north Indian city of Dehradun, is to understand why there is not more research on these glaciers. It is lonely, time-consuming work, equally demanding of body and mind.
Dobhal's days begin inside a tent, not particularly well-suited for such chilly heights, usually around 5:30, with prayers and a cup of hot tea.
This morning's journey is just above the base camp, to 3,900 meters, where Dobhal must install a set of crude bamboo rulers to measure the undulations of the ice. The drilling machine in this case is a steady hiss of steam that comes out of a machine carried on the back and inserted into the glacier through a long, narrow pipe. Dobhal drives it slowly through the solid black ice, taking care to drill an absolutely straight four-meter-long hole.
When it is done, the bamboo pole slides in effortlessly. When he is finished, there will be 40 such stakes up and down the Chorabari, in the upper reaches where the ice accumulates in winter, all the way down to where the snout spills its meltwaters. Over the next months, the stakes will record the rise and fall of the ice - in other words, changes in the glacier's total mass.
Downstream, where the glacier's meltwater becomes what is known as the Mandakini River, comes another set of crucial measurements. Six times a day, Dobhal and his aides, all ethnic Gurkhas from Nepal, measure the depth of the water and the speed at which it flows.
It is a remarkably simple experiment, like one for a high school science fair. A square wooden paddle, attached to a string, is floated down the channel. A stopwatch measures how long it takes to travel seven meters.
"This will tell me how much water we are getting from one glacier and at different seasons - how much in summer, how much in winter, how much in the rainy season," Dobhal said. Think of the glacier as a bank account, Dobhal offered. If its total volume - as measured by the stakes installed in the ice - is "how much we have in the bank," then the flow of the Mandakini is like the dividends being released for everyday use.
Dobhal's days follow a relentlessly measured pattern. Every day, he is back at the base camp no later than 2 p.m., which is when the risk of an avalanche grows. Even in summer, there are fluke snowstorms; one in late May kept Dobhal and his crew up all night, brushing snow off the tops of their tents.
Tourists and trekkers rarely venture up to these heights. Even the wildlife is limited to bears and mountain rats. Financing, too, is limited. This year, Dobhal said he dug into his own pockets to buy winter socks for his aides.
Over the coming months, barring an avalanche that could tear them down, the stakes will chronicle the changes in the glacier. At the end of summer, Dobhal will return to the base camp to see how far the ice has shrunk, and again, he will come when winter sets in, for another set of measurements. Thus, the fate of the Chorabari glacier will slowly, painstakingly be revealed.
By Somini Sengupta
International Herald Tribune July 17, 2007
CHORABARI GLACIER, India: This is how a glacier retreats. At nearly 4,000 meters above sea level, in the shadow of a sharp Himalayan peak, a wall of black ice oozes in the sunshine. A tumbling stone breaks the silence of the mountains, or water gurgles under the ground, a sign that the glacier is melting from inside. Where it empties out - scientists call it the snout - a noisy, frothy stream rushes down to meet the River Ganges.
D.P. Dobhal, a glaciologist who has spent three years climbing and poking the Chorabari glacier, stands at the edge of the snout and points ahead. Three years ago, the snout was roughly 27 meters, or 90 feet, farther away. On a map drawn in 1962, it was plotted 262 meters from here. Dobhal marked the spot with a Stonehenge-like pile of rocks.
Dobhal's steep and solitary quest - to measure the changes in the glacier's size and volume - points to a looming worldwide concern with particularly serious repercussions for India and its neighbors. The thousands of glaciers studded across 2,400 kilometers, or 1,500 miles, of the Himalayas make up the savings account of South Asia's water supply, feeding more than a dozen major rivers and sustaining a billion people downstream. Their apparent retreat threatens to bear heavily on everything from the region's drinking water supply to agricultural production to disease and floods.
Indian glaciers are among the least studied in the world, lacking the decades of data that scientists need to deduce trends. Nevertheless, the nascent research offers a snapshot of the consequences of global warming for this country and raises vital questions about how it will respond to them.
According to Dobhal's measurements, the Chorabari's snout has retreated nine meters every year for the last three years, and while that is too short a time to draw any scientific conclusions about the glacier's health, it conforms to a disquieting pattern of glacial retreat across the Himalayas.
A recent study by the Indian Space Research Organization, using satellite imaging to gauge the changes to 466 glaciers, has found more than a 20 percent reduction in size between 1962 and 2001, with bigger glaciers breaking into smaller pieces, each one retreating faster than its parent. A separate study found the Parbati glacier, one of the largest in the area, to be retreating by 52 meters a year during the 1990s. Another glacier that Dobhal has tracked, known as Dokriani, lost 20 percent of its size in three decades. Between 1991 and 1995, its snout withdrew almost 17 meters each year.
Similar losses are being seen around the world. Lonnie Thompson, a glaciologist at Ohio State University, found a 22 percent loss of ice on the Qori Kalis glacier in Peru between 1963 and 2002. He called it "a repeating theme whether you are in the tropical Andes, the Himalayas or Kilimanjaro in Africa."
The Chorabari, sweeping down from Kedarnath across nearly six square kilometers, is relatively lucky. It has a thick cover of rocks and boulders, which acts as a sort of insulation and slows down the melting.
Since Dobhal began collecting data here in 2003, the Chorabari has been shedding its weight - that is to say, melting faster than the rate at which snow and ice accumulates, and as a result, thinning out by roughly 1.5 meters each year. The snow line, in addition, is gradually moving higher.
A vast and ancient sheet of ice, a glacier is in effect the planet's most sensitive organ, like an aging knee that feels the onset of winter. Its upper reaches accumulate snow and ice when it is cold; its lower reaches melt when it is warm. Its long-term survival depends on the balance between the buildup and the melting. Glaciers worldwide serve as a barometer for global warming, which has, according to a report this year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, been spurred in recent decades by rising levels of greenhouse gases.
Even the Himalayas have grown measurably warmer. A recent study found that mean air temperature in the northwestern Himalayan range had risen by 2.2 degrees Celsius (4 degrees Fahrenheit) in the past two decades, a rate considerably higher than the rate of increase over the last 100 years.
It its report, the international panel predicted that as these glaciers melt, they would increase the likelihood of flooding over the next three decades and then, as they recede, dry up the rivers that they feed.
"In the course of the century," it said, "water supply stored in glaciers and snow cover are projected to decline, reducing water availability in regions supplied by meltwater from major mountain ranges, where more than one-sixth of the world population currently lives."
India's public response so far has been to blame the industrialized world for rising emissions and resist any mandatory caps of its own. India's per-capita share of emissions is one-twentieth that of industrialized countries, the government points out, going on to argue that any restrictions on emissions would stunt its economic growth.
And yet, as critics say, India's rapid economic advance, combined with a population of more than a billion people, will soon make it a far bigger contributor to greenhouse gases. More to the point, India stands to bear some of the most devastating consequences of human-induced climate change.
The dearth of scientific knowledge adds to the alarm. River flow data are so scant and recent that it is impossible for scientists to predict how current rates of glacial retreat will affect river volume.
To spend a couple of days with Dobhal, 44, a glaciologist with the Wadia Institute for Himalayan Geology, a government-sponsored research institution based in the north Indian city of Dehradun, is to understand why there is not more research on these glaciers. It is lonely, time-consuming work, equally demanding of body and mind.
Dobhal's days begin inside a tent, not particularly well-suited for such chilly heights, usually around 5:30, with prayers and a cup of hot tea.
This morning's journey is just above the base camp, to 3,900 meters, where Dobhal must install a set of crude bamboo rulers to measure the undulations of the ice. The drilling machine in this case is a steady hiss of steam that comes out of a machine carried on the back and inserted into the glacier through a long, narrow pipe. Dobhal drives it slowly through the solid black ice, taking care to drill an absolutely straight four-meter-long hole.
When it is done, the bamboo pole slides in effortlessly. When he is finished, there will be 40 such stakes up and down the Chorabari, in the upper reaches where the ice accumulates in winter, all the way down to where the snout spills its meltwaters. Over the next months, the stakes will record the rise and fall of the ice - in other words, changes in the glacier's total mass.
Downstream, where the glacier's meltwater becomes what is known as the Mandakini River, comes another set of crucial measurements. Six times a day, Dobhal and his aides, all ethnic Gurkhas from Nepal, measure the depth of the water and the speed at which it flows.
It is a remarkably simple experiment, like one for a high school science fair. A square wooden paddle, attached to a string, is floated down the channel. A stopwatch measures how long it takes to travel seven meters.
"This will tell me how much water we are getting from one glacier and at different seasons - how much in summer, how much in winter, how much in the rainy season," Dobhal said. Think of the glacier as a bank account, Dobhal offered. If its total volume - as measured by the stakes installed in the ice - is "how much we have in the bank," then the flow of the Mandakini is like the dividends being released for everyday use.
Dobhal's days follow a relentlessly measured pattern. Every day, he is back at the base camp no later than 2 p.m., which is when the risk of an avalanche grows. Even in summer, there are fluke snowstorms; one in late May kept Dobhal and his crew up all night, brushing snow off the tops of their tents.
Tourists and trekkers rarely venture up to these heights. Even the wildlife is limited to bears and mountain rats. Financing, too, is limited. This year, Dobhal said he dug into his own pockets to buy winter socks for his aides.
Over the coming months, barring an avalanche that could tear them down, the stakes will chronicle the changes in the glacier. At the end of summer, Dobhal will return to the base camp to see how far the ice has shrunk, and again, he will come when winter sets in, for another set of measurements. Thus, the fate of the Chorabari glacier will slowly, painstakingly be revealed.
posted by Silabilm at 7:55 PM
1 comments
